tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196474091232449207.post6560309123364940621..comments2024-03-15T20:14:57.052-04:00Comments on Direct to Video Connoisseur: Shadow Man (2006)Direct to Video Connoisseurhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02310858965138247572noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196474091232449207.post-10777668708767359982009-10-08T12:00:56.994-04:002009-10-08T12:00:56.994-04:00Thanks a bunch for your support. Yeah, Against the...Thanks a bunch for your support. Yeah, Against the Dark was an extreme disappointment, and it could've been so good!Direct to Video Connoisseurhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02310858965138247572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196474091232449207.post-4874241743134851322009-10-08T10:33:53.619-04:002009-10-08T10:33:53.619-04:00I went through your Segal reviews, and read the on...I went through your Segal reviews, and read the one for his vampire flick Against the Dark. I hate it when they do that thing where the "main star" only appears for a few minutes. It feels like a rip off when they do that! I mean, isnt Segals name the top billing on the cover of the film? <br /><br />I believe they also did this in another Segal movie, the one with Kurt Russell? Executive Decision. Where Segal only appears at the beginning of the movie then suddenly he just dies! <br /><br />Yesterday I went through a bunch of your reviews man! Commented on a few of them! Nice job on all these reviews, a lot of them make me laugh out loud with their sense of humor.Franco Macabrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10994905312221715861noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196474091232449207.post-30237666359868937432009-10-06T16:28:47.805-04:002009-10-06T16:28:47.805-04:00I'm going to have to respectfully disagree wit...I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you as far as the mighty having fallen. For us DTV fans, he's never left. The vampire movie (Against the Dark, which I've reviewed if you want to check it out-- just click the Seagal link in the labels section), was a disappointment, but had it been more like Blade 2, it would've been better. You may want to check the list of reviews for some other watchable Seagal films as well, because there are plenty.<br /><br />Seagal is, unfortunately, losing his martial arts prowess. He's 58, so the mere fact he even has any prowess now is remarkable. It's also important to note that his first film wasn't until 1988, when he was 37 years old. That means I still have another 7 years left to start my own career as an action star.Matt Poirierhttp://www.mattmovieguy.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-196474091232449207.post-62019782056408316322009-10-06T12:30:48.080-04:002009-10-06T12:30:48.080-04:00I think the last watchable Segal movie I saw was T...I think the last watchable Segal movie I saw was The Glimmer Man (coincidently, I think it was his last theatrical film) this dtv films title sounds almost like a sequel to The Glimmer Man. <br /><br />Segal looks like he isnt phisically capable of doing martial arts any longer. Are his action sequences faked? Does he do his own stunts anymore? He just looks so out of shape to me! <br /><br />I couldnt believe it when I saw he made his first vampire movie! Oh how the mighty have fallen, these guys were so huge back in the 80s! Out for Justice...Hard to Kill...Franco Macabrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10994905312221715861noreply@blogger.com