The Direct to Video Connoisseur

I'm a huge fan of action, horror, sci-fi, and comedy, especially of the Direct to Video variety. In this blog I review some of my favorites and not so favorites, and encourage people to comment and add to the discussion. If you click on an image, it will take you to that post's image page, which includes many more pics from the film and other goodies I couldn't fit in the actual review. For announcements and updates, don't forget to Follow us on Twitter and Like our Facebook page. If you're the director, producer, distributor, etc. of a low-budget feature length film and you'd like to send me a copy to review, you can contact me at dtvconnoisseur[at] I'd love to check out what you got.



Hi everyone, it's been a while since I checked the page, and I wanted to make a few announcements.

First and foremost, it appears a dubious site has claimed the old url, meaning any link in any review that goes to the old mattmovieguy url is corrupt. I'm in the process of trying to remove them all, but it's a lot! It's best not to click on any link without hovering over it first to make sure it doesn't have mattmovieguy in the url.

Second, it appears since my last trip to the blog, Photobucket has decided to charge for third party hosting, meaning none of my images are appearing anymore. That's simply an aesthetic issue, but still annoying.

Thank you all for your patience, and again, hopefully this will all be fixed soon.


Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Force of Execution (2013)

 photo forceofexecutioncova_zps99406ccf.jpg

I looked at this film back in February or March before I moved down to DelCo, PA, with the idea in mind that I would use it to get back to doing more posts again after a hiatus.  Instead, it sat on the shelf until June, when, after telling Moe at Drunk on VHS and Jon at the After Movie Diner that I would do a podcast on their night of programming (the DTVC Podcast can be heard live every Wednesday from 8-9pm at, I was stuck without a movie and a guest for my second show.  So I decided to do an hour, solo, on this film and Steven Seagal in general.  It wasn't pretty, which is why you won't find that episode on our archive page.  What did happen in that episode though, was my guest from the first episode (Mega Shark vs. Mecha Shark), Jamie, was commenting in the chat, helping me out, and from that episode on she's been our regular cohost on the DTVC Podcast-- and the show has been great ever since.

Force of Execution has Mr. Seagal as a crime boss in New Mexico or something, who sends his number one guy, Bren Foster, in to take out a snitch in the local prison.  Problem is, Ving Rhames tells him to kill the wrong guy, and the people who wanted the snitch dead are pissed at Seagal's guy.  This leads to the guy getting his hands smashed and Seagal retiring him for awhile, living in a studio above Danny Trejo's restaurant, which is own by Seagal and is where Seagal's daughter works.  Long story short, Rhames gets out of prison, tries to start a turf war to take over from Seagal, Trejo uses scorpions to fix Foster's hands, and after the daughter is kidnapped they save her and live happily ever after.

 photo forceofexecution8a_zpsbf0e8967.jpg

I don't know what happened with this film.  It was okay in the early going, the Bren Foster going into the prison to take care of business was awesome, and I thought, "hey, I can live with this."  Then it was left turnsville all over the place.  We got Foster with crippled hands, then Trejo uses scorpions later in the film to fix them.  What?  Was there any point in the film that it looked like Rhames would beat Seagal?  No.  Then we have the damsel in distress trope mixed with the gross, "protect our blond white women from degenerate black men" trope that those espousing a so-called "post-racial" US will tell you shouldn't exist anymore, but there it was in all it grossness.  Ultimately I'm left wondering "where was that film I used to know when Bren Foster was kicking ass?"

Let's start with Seagal.  When I was writing this and also preparing for that ill-fated podcast, I went into it after watching this film with the idea that all of Seagal's recent DTV stuff was crap.  That's not really true, in fact he's had some good ones.  For example, 2009's Driven to Kill.  Okay, I guess that was 5 years ago now, so who knows.  The biggest problem here was that the film was setting up as a Bren Foster vehicle with Seagal perhaps passing the torch, or maybe being the number one but giving Foster the bulk of the fights.  Either one would have worked, instead of this muddled thing we had here.  Is it possible that Seagal isn't able to pass the torch?  That he can't let a potential talent like Foster really take the film and run with it?  I can understand that, but if that's the case, don't set it up like Foster is the main guy, or the one the story is centered on.  This film started in one direction, a direction that worked, and then went in an entirely different direction that didn't work, and that was the biggest disappointment.  Seagal still has some more films coming down the pike.  We'll see what they look like.

 photo forceofexecution9a_zps74326557.jpg

I want to get back to Bren Foster and his character.  He had a sweet scene in the beginning, proving beyond anything that he can get after it.  Also, the having his hands crippled I don't think was a deal breaker, that has happened before-- Yojimbo for example.  What would've been cool is if he could've gone all Yojimbo to get his revenge on both Seagal and Rhames, like he starts a turf war between the two and they kill each other and he comes out on top.  Again, Seagal couldn't let that happen, he had to be the omnipotent leader, he had to be a good guy despite being a crime boss, and he couldn't let anyone, especially not Bren Foster, get over on him, even if he was playing a baddie.  And then we have the scorpion thing, which made no sense.  We had a good fight where Foster took out some guys with no hands.  Why couldn't we do that?  Have a guru train him to fight without his hands, and then he gets his revenge, fooling people by playing the part of the helpless crippled man.  Instead we got a mess.

Ving Rhames plays the baddie.  Unlike Seagal, he doesn't mind being the bad guy who ultimately loses.  He was awesome in this role, making sure he played a baddie that was entertaining but sufficiently bad enough that we want him to be taken down.  In my mind though, while he can play a great villain, his best DTV turn was as the hero in The Tournament, and hopefully we'll get more of that in the future.  Danny Trejo had a smaller role as, I don't know, The Noble Savage?  As I mentioned above, this film did not do well with the way it injected race into it, and while Trejo with the whole scorpion thing wasn't as bad as the black degenerate gangsters and the need to protect the blond white woman from them, it was still a little off.  I think Trejo as Foster's landlord as an independent character, apart from Seagal, would've worked much better-- and get rid of the scorpions too.

 photo forceofexecution11a_zps48f90258.jpg

This was what Seagal looked like in the final scene, SWAT gear, special ops, seemingly out of nowhere.  "Oh, by the way, crime boss knows special ops too.  What?  What's wrong with that?"  Maybe this is the future of Seagal though?  No more slap-chop covered up by shaky cam attempt at a solid fight scene, maybe special ops is how he furthers his action career.  We did have it in Maximum Conviction, and while it didn't necessarily work, I'm willing to withhold judgement.  Let's see what happens, but if we get a Pistol Whipped with good shootouts based on this Seagal, I'll take it.

So this is a pass for me, it's just a muddled mess that seems to be more indicative of Seagal's recent DTV output.  That's too bad, because if Seagal took a step back and let a Bren Foster take him down, we might have had the film we wanted.  As he saw in Machete, it's okay to be the baddie, and for some movies, it works better.  This film is one where it would have, and because he didn't play the baddie, the whole thing suffered.

For more info:


  1. Glad to see another review man. I too have had this on my shelf so long that his new film, A Good Man, is out today. I'm a full Seagal behind!

    1. Ah, I haven't seen that either. It's a tough call if I will after this one, but we'll see hahaha